The best way to think about LFT is that ligands coordinate in specific configurations that will interact with the orbitals in specific ways
The orbitals in which the ligand overlaps are distorted, causing them to take on a higher energy and the non interacting ones relax, causing them to lower
An implication of this is that the splitting of the d-orbitals is entirely dependent on the geometry of the complex, with each geometry splitting the orbitals in a different manner
The energy distance between the split orbitals is \(\Delta_O\) (change in ocrtahedral)
\(\Delta_O=10 Dq\)
This can be split into stabilisation and destabilisation energy
\(−4\Delta_O\) and \(+6\Delta_O\)
In the below example, there is one electron occupying the d-orbitals, so there is a total of \(0.4\Delta_O\) of crystal field stabilisation energy (CFSE)
As we increase the occupation of the stabilising orbitals, the CFSE increases
Ligands-metal bonds aren’t entirely ionic and need to be though of in terms of \(\sigma\), \(\pi\) and \(\Delta\) bonds
The strength of the ligand field and the resulting energy associated with \(\Delta_O\) is completely based on the ligand and it’s relative field strenght
The spectrochemical series directly links the strength of the ligand field and the resulting \(\Delta_O\) to the colour of the light produced through HOMO-LUMO excitation
Going down a periodic group also results in a larger \(\Delta\)